Re: UPDATE: Boeing Co. To Build New 777 Cargo Plane >BA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I respect your opinions and your friends opinions but I cannot find any info
to support that statement.  I'm not defending it against the 135 but there
were a lot more 135's built.  I'd be very interested if there were something
to read.  I am a big fan of the 707/720/135 family.  My first experience in
the 135 was probably about 1957-58.  I loved the old water wagons.
Al

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: UPDATE: Boeing Co. To Build New 777 Cargo Plane >BA


> Well, I know someone who was an MX crew chief on the KC-10 who saw nothing
> but problems and the fighter pilots I know who hate it because it was
> never as
> reliable in getting them fuel as the KC-135.  The KC-10 was just something
> to
> say "look how big we can get one"
>
> In a message dated 11/15/2004 9:12:26 PM Central Standard Time,
> damiross3@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> The KC-10 is not a needless flop
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]