Re: Airport Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Should the question be terminal architecture?
Al
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clay Wardlow" <clay.wardlow@xxxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Airport Architecture


I have to agree with you on MEM. Function (if you can call it that) over
fashion, that's for sure.

SEA is kind of like that too, although the new A Concourse is really
nice and the new Central Terminal building will be really nice when it's
finished.

Clay - SEA

-----Original Message-----
From: Alireza Alivandivafa [mailto:DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Airport Architecture

LAX for its simplicity, uniqueness and meaning to me.  I love the old
ONT
terminals with the stained glass window, the new ones suck.  The JFK TWA
terminal
is really cool looking.

MEM is a bit of a craphole, but the Fed-Ex superhub is cool to fly over

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]