Alireza, JetBlue has about 150 seats in them. I think they started with more but ended up with 150 eventually after the increased the pitch on last few rows. Someone with better JetBlue experience can confirm this.. 164 people vs. 150 you say? 14 people are 14 x 190 = 3040 lbs with luggage can easily make to 3500-3600 lbs. That makes a difference when you are flying on the edge of the fuel envelope. BAHA Fan of A320s -----Original Message----- From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew Montano Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:21 PM To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: CP's 737 cross-country jaunts --Apple-Mail-1--273250183 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Yup. But the nature of Tango's 164 or 168 pax probably had a full luggage load and a bit of cargo. (Charter/tourist traffic.) Matthew On 31-Aug-04, at 1:31 PM, Alireza Alivandivafa wrote: > Um, jetBlue flies A320s with similar loads JFK-LGB and that is 400 > more miles > > In a message dated 8/31/2004 1:23:10 PM Central Daylight Time, > mmontano@xxxxxxxxx writes: > Even the A320, in Air Canada's brief "Tango" configuration (160 odd > cattle class) could barely do Vancouver<->Toronto in a full pax w/ > luggage load. --Apple-Mail-1--273250183 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=US-ASCII Yup. But the nature of Tango's 164 or 168 pax probably had a full luggage load and a bit of cargo. (Charter/tourist traffic.) Matthew <bold> </bold> On 31-Aug-04, at 1:31 PM, Alireza Alivandivafa wrote: <excerpt>Um, jetBlue flies A320s with similar loads JFK-LGB and that is 400 more miles In a message dated 8/31/2004 1:23:10 PM Central Daylight Time, mmontano@xxxxxxxxx writes: Even the A320, in Air Canada's brief "Tango" configuration (160 odd cattle class) could barely do Vancouver<<->Toronto in a full pax w/ luggage load. </excerpt> --Apple-Mail-1--273250183--