--Apple-Mail-1--273250183
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Yup.
But the nature of Tango's 164 or 168 pax probably had a full luggage
load and a bit of cargo. (Charter/tourist traffic.)
Matthew
On 31-Aug-04, at 1:31 PM, Alireza Alivandivafa wrote:
> Um, jetBlue flies A320s with similar loads JFK-LGB and that is 400
> more miles
>
> In a message dated 8/31/2004 1:23:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
> mmontano@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> Even the A320, in Air Canada's brief "Tango" configuration (160 odd
> cattle class) could barely do Vancouver<->Toronto in a full pax w/
> luggage load.
--Apple-Mail-1--273250183
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
charset=US-ASCII
Yup.
But the nature of Tango's 164 or 168 pax probably had a full luggage
load and a bit of cargo. (Charter/tourist traffic.)
Matthew
<bold> </bold>
On 31-Aug-04, at 1:31 PM, Alireza Alivandivafa wrote:
<excerpt>Um, jetBlue flies A320s with similar loads JFK-LGB and that
is 400 more miles
In a message dated 8/31/2004 1:23:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
mmontano@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Even the A320, in Air Canada's brief "Tango" configuration (160 odd
cattle class) could barely do Vancouver<<->Toronto in a full pax w/
luggage load.
</excerpt>
--Apple-Mail-1--273250183--