Re: Airbus 380: They're Doing it Again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 19:03
Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Airbus 380: They're Doing it Again


> In a message dated 12/4/2003 9:02:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> mmontano@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << The other thing is that the A380 has an awesome range. While many parts
>  of East-Asia are just on the fringe of of non-stop range from the US
>  with existing 747-400s and now A340-500/600s, the A380 puts it all
>  within non-stop range. There will be no more technical stops in
>  Anchorage/Vancouver/Hawaii and JFK/HKG will become a year-around normal
>  flight. >>
>
> Um, I believe the A345 has longer range than the A380 will have, and
SIN-LAX
> nonstops with the 380 will be a stretch

A340-500: 8,650 nm
A380: 7,800 nm
A380HGW (High Gross Weight): 8,150 nm

So, even though Alireza is wrong on his choice of drink (i.e. thinks AmWest
does wrong serving Pepsi), he is right here.

Question: The A340-500 range is with 313 pax; does anybody know what it is
with SQ's configuration (181 pax)?

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]