Fwd: Editorial: LAX $9B expansion plan is half-baked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- In BATN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "12/1 Los Angeles Times" <batn@xxxx>
wrote:
Published Monday, December 1, 2003, in the Los Angeles Times

Editorial

A Half-Baked LAX Plan

Mayor James K. Hahn's $9-billion plan for remaking Los Angeles
International Airport is as urgently in need of an overhaul as the
airport itself. The time to fix the proposal is now, before it goes
to the City Council for approval early next year.

When he first introduced the plan just weeks after 9/11, Hahn called
for making LAX more secure against terrorism. Experts disagree over
whether all those billions would boost security as billed. More
important, no plan to redo LAX can be credible as long as it
sidesteps the fundamental problem facing the flying public in this
region: overcrowding on the roads to the airport and in the number
of passenger and cargo flights the airport must manage daily.

Hahn's plan would demolish Terminals 1, 2 and 3, put a massive new
terminal complex where the parking garages are now and move parking
and passenger drop-off to a remote "ground transportation center" to
be built near the San Diego Freeway. An automated people mover would
ferry passengers and their meeters and greeters between the drop-off
center and the terminal.

The payoffs are questionable. The added "rings" of security rely on
unproven technologies like facial recognition software; Hahn's plan
doesn't say what these futuristic devices would cost or who would
operate them. And although relocating the passenger drop-off might
protect terminal buildings from car bombs, people would remain just
as vulnerable at the remote site.

Closing the terminal area to cars would solve a long-time complaint
that the constantly clogged horseshoe-shaped road slows emergency
vehicles. But Hahn's plan contains other, less drastic ways to reduce
congestion, such as adding new "fly away" bus routes and extending
the Green Line light-rail service all the way to the airport.

Hahn's plan keeps an unwise campaign promise to cap the number of
passengers at LAX even though, under federal law, cities can't limit
flights or passengers unless a cap was in place before the government
deregulated the airline industry. Hahn aims to achieve his cap by
cutting the number of gates for planes to load and unload passengers,
essentially crowding them out and forcing them to go elsewhere. That
just raises another question: Where?

The best way to serve a projected doubling of passengers in Los
Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside and Ventura counties is
through a system of regional airports. But where is the evidence that
Hahn's expensive gamble would force such a system into existence?
Voters in Orange County last year killed plans to make the closed El
Toro Marine base into a commercial airport. Other outlying airports
currently serve no commercial customers, and all lack the high-speed
rail connections that planners say are critical to making a regional
system work.

Under deregulation, airlines decide which airports to use and what
fares to offer based on passenger demand and profitability; short of
jiggering landing fees, cities wield little influence. Hahn and
others who want to spread the load -- and lessen the appeal of any
single airport as a terrorist target -- should lean on the California
congressional delegation.

Delegation members should push the federal government to allow enough
re-regulation to establish a rational regional system, at the very
least to test such a plan in the nation's most overcrowded flying
market. This would take unprecedented teamwork on the part of
federal, state and local legislators; Hahn can't do it alone.

In the post-9/11 world, most experts counsel staying flexible to see
which security technologies prove useful instead of investing
billions now in steel and concrete that may not accommodate
tomorrow's innovations. And the economy of Southern California can't
hang on a plan that doesn't present clear strategies to address the
air traffic growth that is surely coming. The current LAX plan needs
dramatic revision to take account of these realities.
--- End forwarded message ---

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]