Re: destination versus routing pricing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 6:05PM -0800, damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> It's entirely due to competition.
> I looked at several different city pairs.  I found that it was possible
> to have
> a connecting flight that is cheaper than a non-stop.  Why?  My feeling
> is that
> the airline wants to get that last seat filled (these were all
> discounted
> fares) and if they have to fly a passenger out of his way to do it,
> they will.
> Actually, this is a win-win situation.  The passenger gets a cheaper
> flight and
> the airline gets addtional revenue.

When I was working at Cheap Tickets, I saw this  a few times. It
generally happened when the combined tariffs for something like MKE-MSP
and then MSP-DEN would be less than the tariff to fly MKE-DEN routed
through MSP. I suspect this happens most when there is a fare sale that
affects part of your itinerary.

--
David Mueller / MRY
dmueller7@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.quanterium.com

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]