If that's the case for an A320 on YYZ-YVR route how is it on an A321 on the YUL-YVR non-stop? :) I know A321 has got shorter legs, or am I just wrong? :) BAHA -----Original Message----- From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Matthew Montano Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:50 AM To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Right Plane, Right Routes 3000nm is Airbus' claim for the 320 for a full load in a 'realistic' scenario. Reality maybe more real. Air Canada's Tango, using A320's with a Y class only layout (159 seats plus 5 crew) from YYZ-YVR (2,178 miles as the crow flies) frequently has load restrictions, requiring (so a Toronto Star reporter wrote) that some passengers had to move around for load-balancing, and that some luggage is frequently left-behind. LAX-BOS is how many miles? Matthew On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 03:15 PM, Alireza Alivandivafa wrote: > A320s fly all the time coast to coast, with no problem, so I don't > think that > is the issue. According to Airbus, the range of the plane is > something like > 5400 KM, and that is more than enough to do any route in the > continental US. > Even if there are strong winds, B6 can always use 8000 feet of the > 10500 > runway at LGB and say piss off to the wind. The airport is at sea > level, remember?