We're saying the same thing ----- Original Message ----- From: <damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [Sky-1] A318 vs B717 > I know that. However, there are exceptions. If the runways at LAX were rounded > off, all four runways should be numbered 07/25. Because there's four runways > involved and only 3 letter suffixes available (L, C, R for left, center, and > right), LAX and other airports with 4 or more parallel runways round down and > round up instead of strictly rounding up. > > Runways are numbered by the inbound magnetic heading rounded off to two > > digits. > > Al > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David MR" <damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:49 PM > > Subject: Re: [Sky-1] A318 vs B717 > > > > > > > A bit of trivia for you: > > > The LAX runways are not nearly parallel but are in fact actually parallel. > > > They are numbered differently to make it easier for air traffic control. > > > headings for runways 6 and 7 are 69 degree magnetic > > > headings for runways 24 and 25 are 249 magnetic > > > > > > http://www.airnav.com/airport/KLAX - scroll down to the runway data > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx> > > > To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 19:01 > > > Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] [Sky-1] A318 vs B717 > > > > > > > > > > I like the LAX setup. 2 sets of nearly paralel paralels. I am also in > > > favor > > > > of more runways when they are needed. I am in favor of the 5th at LAX, > > in > > > > the south field > > > > > > > >