Re: Airbus battle for Japan skies seen a long haul

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



All 747's are on the same FAA type certificate so therefore the 744 is not
considered a new aircraft but, as Grant mentions, a redesign of an existing
model.

Same thing holds true for the 737.  All models from 100 to 900 are on the same
TC.

David R
> I'm aware of the improvements Boeing made to the 744 but it is not a new
> aircraft. It is a partial redesign of an older model. We might just have to
> agree to disagree on this one.
>
> Grant
> QF
> SYD
>
>
>
> At 12:42 AM 24/06/03 -0400, you wrote:
> >In a message dated 6/23/2003 4:01:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> >gjmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >
> ><< I don't consider the B744 a new aircraft. It's a variant of an design
> >  that's over thirty years old.  It may have a new type of wing and new
> >  engines but it is still essentially a 1960s design.  The A380 is a totally
> >  new aircraft as is the B777 but the B744 definitely is not. >>
> >
> >The 744 also has new materials making it lighter yet bigger, a 2 person EFIS
> >Cockpit and millions of other differences.  It is like calling a 737-800 the
> >same plane as a stovepipe -100.  Not even close, except for the weird rudder
> >design.  The A380 could be called a big A320 (look at it), considering all the
> >commonality that Airbus says they have

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]