Re: Airbus battle for Japan skies seen a long haul

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm aware of the improvements Boeing made to the 744 but it is not a new
aircraft. It is a partial redesign of an older model. We might just have to
agree to disagree on this one.

Grant
QF
SYD



At 12:42 AM 24/06/03 -0400, you wrote:
>In a message dated 6/23/2003 4:01:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>gjmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
><< I don't consider the B744 a new aircraft. It's a variant of an design
>  that's over thirty years old.  It may have a new type of wing and new
>  engines but it is still essentially a 1960s design.  The A380 is a totally
>  new aircraft as is the B777 but the B744 definitely is not. >>
>
>The 744 also has new materials making it lighter yet bigger, a 2 person EFIS
>Cockpit and millions of other differences.  It is like calling a 737-800 the
>same plane as a stovepipe -100.  Not even close, except for the weird rudder
>design.  The A380 could be called a big A320 (look at it), considering all the
>commonality that Airbus says they have

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]