I don't know what you are talking about but I'm guessing it's about airline strikes. Are you telling me it's okay for a relatively few number of people who have a beef with their employer to inconvenience thousands of people. People who may need to get home to see their mom or dad before they die? People who are returning home to see friends and family they haven't seen in years? People trying to get somewhere fast so they can help others? Unless your heart is as cold as a witch's tit, as the saying goes, I don't think you can really believe this. Not only is it an inconvenience to others, it is also damn selfish of a few people. Use binding arbitration, not a strike! David R http://home.attbi.com/~damiross http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx> To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 17:49 Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Star-Telegram Staff Writer > Good. Strikes are needed, no matter how much they may inconvinience people >