Re: Detecting hijackers by seat of the pants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gawd, what about the poor bloke who's just nervous because he's flying to a
huge make or break sales presentation, or to a job interview?

Big brother...

Mike Gammon

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger James" <ejames@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: Detecting hijackers by seat of the pants


> Detecting hijackers by seat of the pants
> By Fred Reed THE WASHINGTON TIMES
>
> In New Scientist, the British journal of science and technology, I
discover
> that the British are developing a terrorist-detecting airline seat. Yes.
It
> will monitor behavior to see whether you might be a
> hijacker.      "Intelligent airline seats could automatically alert busy
> cabin crew to nervous, shifty passengers, who might be terrorists or
> air-ragers," says the magazine.  The alert seat is being designed at
> Qinetiq, a firm working under contract for the Ministry of Defense. It
will
> use an array of pressure-sensors built into the seat to monitor the
> passenger's movement. A computer will alert the airplane's crew to anyone
> who seems agitated. In the future, says Qinetiq, further sensors may
> monitor such things as the passenger's body temperature and the moistness
> of his skin to help the computer decide whether he is dangerous.
>
> Other benefits are that the seat could flash a light to warn flight
> attendants that the passenger had been in one position too long, which
> might lead to deep-vein thrombosis.      When I began writing about
> technology, the technology interested me. Now, often, it's the underlying
> psychiatry. Airline seats that monitor our mental states? Have we quietly
> gone nuts?
> A Qinetiq slogan: "The future? We are already working on it." Do you
> suppose we could get them to stop?  Another comforting idea being
developed
> to help us behave is the "Distributed Digital Video Array." These are
> interlinked cameras that recognize people of interest and track their
> movements. The Department of Defense has given a contract to the Computer
> Vision and Robotics Research Laboratory at the University of California at
> San Diego to develop them.
> The idea is that interlinked cameras, connected to computers, would
> recognize suspicious activity, like a car stopping by the fence
surrounding
> a sensitive installation. The computer would then alert a human operator.
>
>   One sees where this is heading, fast. A geeky friend of mine who works
in
> related fields told me, "They want to be able to recognize you when you
get
> off the plane and track you automatically wherever you go. They'll do it.
> It's doable. And you'll never know it."  Now, who "they" are is debatable
> and what they want is speculation. But the capacity for smart, automated
> surveillance is there. And it will improve fast.      There is big money
in
> anti-terrorism now, including federal grants for research. Further, the
> technology for the near-total elimination of privacy happens to be useful
> for a wide variety of profitable and legitimate tasks.      Computerized
> recognition of faces exists. It works. How well it works is debatable.
> Companies like Viisage have been selling face-recognition systems for some
> time.
>
> Computers can already visually track moving objects. Years back, as a
> police reporter, I saw a helicopter-borne video camera that could lock on
> to, say, a particular white car among many others on a freeway below the
> helicopter.     The idea was that a human watcher would soon lose a car
> among many similar cars. The computer didn't. This is proven
> technology.  Computers can read license plates, given of course a
> reasonable angle and lighting. This is not new. It's just optical
character
> recognition.  Linking cameras and their associated computers is, of
course,
> perfectly easy.
>    Would networking all of this be of real use in catching terrorists?
> You'd think so. A terrorist scouts a petroleum farm in hopes of blowing it
> up, the cameras notice, one of them along the road gets his license number
> and passes it to other unobtrusive cameras at all the exits, a central
> computer notifies the FBI, and he gets tailed. Says me, a lot of this
stuff
> will work. I'm just not sure I want it to.
>
>
> ***************************************************
> The owner of Roger's Trinbago Site/TnTisland.com
> Roj (Roger James)
>
> escape email mailto:ejames@xxxxxxxxx
> Trinbago site: www.tntisland.com
> Carib Brass Ctn site www.tntisland.com/caribbeanbrassconnection/
> Steel Expressions www.mts.net/~ejames/se/
> Mas Site: www.tntisland.com/tntrecords/mas2003/
> Site of the Week: http://www.carib-link.net/naparima/naps.html
> TnT Webdirectory: http://search.co.tt
> *********************************************************
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]