Re: AS at LGB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AA's motives are completely transparent.

AS, however, had served LGB in the past and had been considering resuming
service. LGB fits in with their West Coast strategy--they already serve BUR,
LAX, ONT, and SNA. When jetBlue moved in, that certainly increased the sense
of urgency, but I think Alaska's motives are at least a little less
predatory than American's.

But how long did those slots go unused? I don't have any sympathy for anyone
who is crying that jetBlue snatched them all up.

Regards,
Jon
--
Jon Wright
mailto:jwright@xxxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Schnell" <dks28@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:16 AM
Subject: Re: AS at LGB


> Err, no. It is a strategic move to crush a left coast presence by JetBlue.
> It is not that AA and Alaska were suddenly shown a latent demand for air
> travel into and out of LGB. It is that they were willing to do nearly
> anything to keep JetBlue out of the market. LGB has never been a part of
> anyone's long-term plans.

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]