FAA can't find records of inspectors before Charlotte crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FAA can't find records of inspectors before Charlotte crash

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) =97 The Federal Aviation Administration can't find=20
documents showing its inspectors saw mechanics at a West Virginia=20
maintenance hangar work on planes before a Charlotte crash that killed 21=20
people. The chief FAA inspector overseeing maintenance for the airline that=
=20
operated the commuter plane insists he went to the base in Huntington,=20
W.Va., at least twice before the Jan. 8 crash, once after it started=20
operating. Work was performed on the plane at the base two days before the=
=20
crash. Jerry Unruh, the inspector, couldn't explain why his visits didn't=20
show up in a database where information on inspections are captured, The=20
Charlotte Observer reported Saturday. He re-entered inspection records on a=
=20
July 15 visit shortly after speaking with the newspaper, according to an=20
FAA spokeswoman.

But the FAA has been unable to find any records showing inspectors visited=
=20
the hangar after maintenance work began there in late July and before the=20
crash. The discovery comes follow the Observer's request for inspection=20
records. Maintenance work is a key element in trying to determine why US=20
Airways Express Flight 5481 crashed shortly after takeoff from=20
Charlotte/Douglas International Airport. The plane was slated to travel to=
=20
Greer, S.C. The National Transportation Safety Board, which is=20
investigating the crash, has said the flight control cables on the plane=20
were improperly adjusted two days before the crash during work performed at=
=20
the West Virginia hangar. Air Midwest, which operated the flight for US=20
Airways, contracted with Raytheon Aerospace LLC to maintain its planes. In=
=20
turn, Raytheon subcontracted with a Florida company to provide mechanics.=20
The mechanic who adjusted the cables had never done the job on that type of=
=20
plane before, the newspaper reported earlier.

It's unclear whether the FAA was aware of the unusual operating arrangement=
=20
at the maintenance base before the crash. Some experts have said the=20
arrangement would make it harder for the airline to ensure the quality of=20
work. No laws or regulations require the FAA to inspect every maintenance=20
facility an airline operates, according to agency spokesman Les Dorr. The=20
FAA monitors airlines to ensure that they train mechanics appropriately,=20
distribute maintenance manuals and properly calibrate tools, Dorr said.=20
Unruh said he entered the records of his first visit into the computer=20
system shortly after it was completed last summer, according to an FAA=20
spokeswoman, but he believes a computer glitch kept it from being saved.=20
Unruh said he remembers watching mechanics take apart and reassemble a=20
plane's nose gear during a second visit to the hangar before the crash. He=
=20
found no problems with the work, he said. Freedom of Information Act=20
officials say they've been unable to find records of such a visit.

Douglas Burdette, Freedom of Information Act manager for the office that=20
keeps the inspection database, said it's rare that inspection records=20
aren't properly downloaded into the system. Such computer problems probably=
=20
affect one or two of the more than 10,000 inspection records entered into=20
the database annually, he said. Citing the NTSB's investigation, Unruh said=
=20
he couldn't comment about whether the FAA was aware before the crash that=20
Raytheon had contracted with the company called Structural, Modification=20
and Repair Technicians Inc. to provide contract labor. The mechanic who=20
adjusted elevator control cables on the Beech 1900 expected a supervisor to=
=20
inspect his work, a source told the Observer. Investigators are trying to=20
determine whether that happened. The NTSB has scheduled a public hearing on=
=20
the crash for May 20 in Washington. The board also is looking at the=20
plane's weight with shifting baggage as a possible contributing cause of=20
the crash. The plane that crashed was estimated to be within 100 pounds of=
=20
maximum takeoff weight. Since the crash, the FAA has reviewed rules=20
governing passenger and baggage weight in planes with 19 seats and fewer;=20
its preliminary study indicated current weight standards are too low.


***************************************************
The owner of Roger's Trinbago Site/TnTisland.com
Roj (Roger James)

escape email mailto:ejames@xxxxxxxxx
Trinbago site: www.tntisland.com
Carib Brass Ctn site www.tntisland.com/caribbeanbrassconnection/
Steel Expressions www.mts.net/~ejames/se/
Site of the Week: http://www.cso.gov.tt
TnT Webdirectory: http://search.co.tt
*********************************************************

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]