At 12:26 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, RT wrote: >it is becoming increasingly difficult to fly the first Boeing tri jet >domestically. Was there a second? (Anyone answering "DC-10" or "MD-11" will be banished to the gulag for excessive historical revisionism!) (And I'm not allowing the first proposal of a 777, a tri-jet version of the 767 that never got off the drawing board -- and wasn't needed as ETOPS came into play.) >It certainly earned its place in commercial aviation history. Amen.