Airman security rule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Comments On Airman Security Rule
 Tuesday was the last day to comment on the FAA's recent final rule that
allows the TSA to deem any pilot a security threat, making that person
ineligible to hold any FAA airman certificate. There is no appeal except to
the TSA, which may not reveal its evidence, at its own discretion. About 640
comments were filed, many expressing concern over the lack of due process
and the efficacy of the rule. "How many of the 9/11 hijackers had FAA
documents?" asks one. "All of my rights as an American [are going] right
down the drain," says another. Advocacy groups also had negative reactions.
The Aircraft Electronics Association wants the rule rescinded, saying:
"Removing the airman certificate from a key employee in a repair station
could cripple the business. Performing such a removal without sufficient
cause represents a severe harm on a business that is not correlative to any
safety concern." The National Business Aviation Association doesn't like it
either: "Giving an airman 15 days to respond in writing to a revocation that
already has become effective and without any information as to why the
action was taken barely is any process, let alone the process due under the
Fifth Amendment." The Professional Aviation Maintenance Association asks
that the rule be amended to allow for appeal to the NTSB. The EAA says the
rule is "unconstitutional and leaves open a huge gap that could snare
law-abiding U.S. citizens." The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations
says: "The new TSA and FAA rules in their present form are unconstitutional
and improper, in our view." Maybe there were some positive comments among
those 640, but we didn't find any.

BAHA ACUNER - CFI,CFII,MEI

www.bahadiracuner.com
www.acuwings.com

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]