Re: .....and for all these reasons, they should not carry guns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roger,
They may not be a LEO (take it this means law enforcement officer) BUT they
will undergo weapons training. They will also be "deputized" a federal
flight deck officer

David R.
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
http://www.secure-skies.org/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger & Amanda La France" <lafrance@verizon.net>
To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] .....and for all these reasons, they should not carry
guns


>         You know, all we need it to get one stupid pilot to be in the
> crew rest room at the airport and loose his gun or it get stolen.
> Believe me it will happen here in EWR. Next thing you know all flights
> that had left are grounded and all departures stop till we find that
> gun.
>
>         Today, I had a FA get attacked by a pax, the Capt jumped in and
> stopped him. If it escalated further, does the pilot have the ok to pull
> his gun? Now I'm not talking life or death situation, but the pilot is
> not a trained LEO in what to do or how much force he should use.
>
>         To me it just opens to many Pandora's boxes. Compare it to a
> possible hijacker getting past 100 (more or less) passengers and into a
> locked cockpit (with reinforced doors) after what we know from what
> happened on 9/11. It didn't take long for the heroes on UAL93 to figure
> that out.
>
> Just  my opinion,
> Roger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU] On Behalf Of
> David Ross
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:32 PM
> To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU
> Subject: Re: .....and for all these reasons, they should not carry guns
>
>
> The reason why is because the government, in it's normal inability to do
> anything right, has given so many stupid regulations regarding the
> carriage of guns by pilots.
>
> Does it make sense to carry a protection device in a lock box?  No!  It
> should be handy, not locked away.  I can see it now.  "Mr. Hijacker,
> please wait a moment while I unlock my weapon."
>
> The TSA also wants gun-carrying pilots to be interviewed by
> psychologists. This is absurd!  Let me get this straight.  It's okay for
> a pilot to be responsible for hundreds of people and the safety yet he
> can't be trusted with a tool to help prevent those same passengers from
> being in the grips of a terrorist?
>
> Like many government agencies, the TSA is led by totally incompetent
> people. Want to know the difference between TSA and the Boy Scouts?  The
> Boy Scouts have adult leadership.
>
> David R
> http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/airlines.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <lafrance@verizon.net>
> To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:19 PM
> Subject: [AIRLINE] .....and for all these reasons, they should not carry
> guns
>
>
> > ...and for all these reasons, pilots should not carry guns. It puts
> > the
> whole airport at risk.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ALPA Critical of TSA Rule for Pilots Carrying Firearms
> >
> >
> >     WASHINGTON, Feb. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- The head of the nation's
> > largest
> pilot
> > union has told the Transportation Security Administration that the new
> rule
> > governing how armed pilots would carry their firearms creates more
> problems
> > than it solves.
> snip---snip---
> >     The TSA rule also apparently violates a specific provision in the
> > law
> that
> > created the FFDO program, requiring training "to ensure that the
> > officer maintains exclusive control over the officer's firearm at all
> > times ... " The TSA rule would require an FFDO pilot who is flying as
> > a passenger (deadheading or commuting) to have the weapon stowed in
> > the cargo hold -- where it would not be under the officer's control.
> >     TSA has indicated that it will review the program after the
> > initial
> class
> > of 48 pilot applicants has been trained and deployed and make any
> necessary
> > improvements.  We are hopeful that by that point the TSA will realize
> > that
> the
> > lock-box option is seriously flawed.  Failing that, because of the
> > many concerns over this procedure, ALPA will pursue all options, up to
>
> > and including legal and/or legislative action, to correct this
> > problem.
> >
> >
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]