NYTimes.com Article: Weight Is Focus of Plane Safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by psa188@juno.com.


Notice the smug, elitist, New York Times assumption that "These figures were developed before obesity became the public health problem it is today."

psa188@juno.com


Weight Is Focus of Plane Safety

January 28, 2003
By MATTHEW L. WALD






WASHINGTON, Jan. 27 - Saying that overloading may have
contributed to a fatal plane crash this month in North
Carolina, federal aviation officials announced today that
thousands of passengers flying on small planes over the
next month will have to tell ticket agents how much they
weigh, or step on a scale, to check whether existing
estimates of average passenger weight are accurate.

The Federal Aviation Administration is ordering all 24
airlines that operate the small planes to collect weight
information from a sampling of their flights. Investigators
suspect that a Beech 1900 that crashed on takeoff in
Charlotte, N.C., on Jan. 8, killing all 21 people on board,
was overloaded. Flawed weight estimates could have
contributed. If studies show that average passenger weights
have increased, that could require airlines to leave some
passengers or baggage behind, especially on flights
requiring full fuel loads.

Standard guidance from the agency to airlines flying small
planes, including US Airways Express, which operated the
Charlotte plane, is to allow 180 pounds for each adult in
winter and 175 pounds in summer. Both figures include
clothing and shoes and 20 pounds for carry-ons. Children
ages 2 to 12 are assumed to weigh 80 pounds, year round.

These figures were developed before obesity became the
public health problem it is today.

No recent studies have confirmed the current validity of
the government's figures, said Lou Cusimano, deputy
director for flight standards. "If we find the weights
cannot be validated," he said, "we'll take the next step."

That would probably mean a bigger study that would weigh
more people, he said. If the agency concludes that its
averages are too low, it could raise the figures that
airlines must use. The paperwork for the Charlotte plane
showed it was within about 100 pounds of its maximum load,
according to the National Transportation Safety Board,
which is still investigating the accident. If passengers or
their bags weighed more than assumed under the aviation
administration's estimates, it may have been overweight.
The plane's flight data recorder showed that it climbed at
takeoff at an angle of 52 degrees before it crashed. It
pitched up more and more steeply until it was pointed too
high to fly. Investigators are looking into whether too
much weight in the back of the plane caused the nose to
pitch up.

The airlines will be adding 10 pounds to whatever
passengers tell them that they weigh. Peggy Gilligan,
director of flight standards at the agency, said that she
expected people to fib about their weight, but that "they
usually lie in the single digits." But officials said
passengers generally do not consider the weight of their
clothing and shoes.

The airlines will also be weighing bags to verify that
assumptions about their weight are still correct. The
standard allowance is 25 pounds per bag for domestic
flights and 30 pounds for international flights.

Aviation agency officials said they had been using the
180-pounds-per-person estimate since 1995 and possibly
longer.

The rule issued today applies to 24 airlines that operate
planes with 10 to 19 seats. There are 223 such planes in
airline service, made by a number of manufacturers. The
planes include the Beech 1900, the DeHavilland Twin Otter
and the Embraer Bandeirante.

The airlines must ascertain the weight of all passengers
and bags on a sampling of their flights, covering 30
percent of their routes. They must pick flights at varying
times of day, and on a Sunday, a Monday and a Tuesday.

Mr. Cusimano of the aviation agency said that assumptions
on weight were now used only for regular passenger service.
If a small plane were being used as a charter for a
football team or for a group of soldiers with heavy
equipment, he said, the airline would have to weigh each
bag and ask about the weight of each passenger.

Soon after the crash in Charlotte, investigators asked gate
agents if there had been any "large-statured people" among
the passengers, said John Goglia, the safety board member
at the scene. Mr. Goglia said they had not, thus far, asked
next-of-kin about the passengers' weights and would do so
"only if concern got higher" in the overweight theory.
Investigators tried to weigh the luggage, which was
difficult because some of it had burned.

The plane was taking off in clear weather and a light wind
for a scheduled 45-minute trip to the
Greenville-Spartanburg airport in Greer, 84 miles to the
southwest. It nosedived seconds after taking off, slamming
into a maintenance hangar and bursting into flames.

In another response to the Charlotte crash, the agency also
ordered that all airlines flying Beech 1900's complete by
Friday new inspections of the tail assembly to ensure that
the elevators, the parts that control the nose-up or
nose-down attitude, could move as far as they were supposed
to.

The Beech in the Charlotte crash was serviced a few hours
before the crash. Investigators suspect that the cables
that run from the cockpit controls back to the tail were
misrigged when they were reattached and that the elevators
may not have been able to move as far into the nose-down
position as they were designed to.

The order to check the tail assemblies covers 368 Beech
1900's registered in the United States. There are 688 such
planes in the worldwide fleet, including some in cargo use
and some in corporate fleets.

Operators will now have to check the rigging after each
time the tail is serviced, to ensure it moves properly.

The safety board can take more than a year to determine the
cause of some plane accidents. Investigators in the
Charlotte crash have said they are focusing on the cables
that work the tail surfaces, the overall weight of the
plane and whether too much of the weight was concentrated
in the tail.

Officials at the aviation administration said that there
was no direct evidence that the tail was misrigged and
emphasized that it was not their agency but the safety
board that would determine a cause. The safety board is an
independent body, but the F.A.A. is one of the participants
in its air crash investigations, along with the airline
involved, the aircraft manufacturer, and other specialists,
depending on the circumstances of each crash.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/28/politics/28CRAS.html?ex=1044767190&ei=1&en=e4b3002524c28ac9



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
onlinesales@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]