=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate. The original article can be found on SFGate.com here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/news/archive/2003/01/22/n= ational0433EST0479.DTL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wednesday, January 22, 2003 (AP) Federal government challenges marketing alliance of three airlines LESLIE MILLER, Associated Press Writer (01-22) 01:33 PST WASHINGTON (AP) -- Three major airlines say they will go forward with a marketing alliance despite a Transportation Department decision to fight what it considers to be anticompetitive features. The "code-sharing agreement" among Delta, Continental and Northwest -- t= he third-, fourth- and fifth-largest airlines -- would enable each to sell tickets for all three and allow them to reach more destinations without flying more planes. They also could offer reciprocal benefits such as frequent flier miles. The Justice and Transportation departments approved the agreement Friday, but transportation officials added stringent requirements. They feared the three airlines, which would control about 35 percent of the market, would use the alliance to discourage competition without the conditions. The airlines reviewed the government's plan during the weekend and said Tuesday they couldn't accept some of the conditions but would go ahead with the alliance anyway. "That's a pretty strong reaction by the airlines," said Severin Borenstein, a professor at the Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, who formerly worked on airline regulation in the Justice Department. Borenstein said the Justice Department clearly has antitrust authority, but it's less clear what authority the Transportation Department has over code-share agreements. Tuesday afternoon, a Transportation Department statement said the department was specifically directed by Congress to review code-sharing agreements for anticompetitive effects. David Stempler, president of the Air Travelers Association, predicted a long delay before an administrative judge decides the case. The judge's decision could then be taken to the U.S. Court of Appeals. Northwest, Delta and Continental issued a joint statement saying they would go ahead with the plan. The three airlines, which lost about $1 billion in the past three months, are trying to win back passengers with a bigger network and a better frequent flier program. "The bigger the company, the more attractive the frequent flier program," said Alan Bender, an aviation professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Fla. "The more routes they have, the more they can war against the low-cost airlines." Low-cost airlines like JetBlue and Southwest opposed the alliance, saying it amounted to a virtual merger. Darryl Jenkins, head of George Washington University's Aviation Institut= e, said the restrictions were the most far-reaching the Transportation Department had ever imposed. The airlines said the department held them to a different standard than United Air Lines and US Airways, which were allowed to sign a similar agreement in October. The carriers objected to three conditions requiring them to: * Give up leases on airport gates used fewer than six times a day over t= wo months. * Limit the total number of flights that share codes to 2,600. * Refrain from making joint bids on corporate or travel agency contracts. They agreed to relinquish 13 gates at four hub airports, as transportati= on officials demanded. Northwest and Continental have had a code-sharing agreement in place sin= ce 1998. On the Net: Department of Transportation: www.dot.gov =20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 2003 AP