Forgive me, but that seems the opposite of your previous philosophies. Extrapolating a bit ... Delta is not making money (to a large extent) on the service it provides ... So Delta should shut its doors ... So you should be out of a job. Is that how it goes? -----Original Message----- From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU] On Behalf Of AMT@Delta Air Lines Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:51 PM To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU Subject: Re: UAL could move to void union contracts If ANY company cannot manage to make a buck on the service they provide, they should shut the doors. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas Schnell" <dks28@cornell.edu> To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:41 PM Subject: Re: UAL could move to void union contracts > But wouldn't that involve the loss of hundreds of thousands of union > jobs? > > -----Original Message----- > From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU] On Behalf Of > AMT@Delta Air Lines > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:19 PM > To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU > Subject: Re: UAL could move to void union contracts > > > Mark, am I allowed to say "you're an idiot" on this forum? > > AMT's have been bailing out the Airlines since the 80's, if the CEO's > can pay the pilots the way they do, maybe they should get together and > raise fares. > > If ANY company cannot manage to make a buck on the service they > provide, they should shut the doors. > > Butch > > > > If the unions are standing in the way of United's recovery then the > > unions have to go. After the contracts are voided, United should go > > to their employees and say, this is the job, this what we are > > prepared > > > to pay you > to do > > the job, take it or leave it. > > > > Mark > > > > Fan of not wanting to see another airline brought down by it's > > pigheaded unions