Re: No guns for our airline pilots ......

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aircraft are much stronger than you think.  It would take a whole bunch of
bullets to bring about explosive decompression.

from http://www.secure-skies.org/FAQ.asp

On May 2, 2002, Mr. Ron J. Hinderberger - Director, Aviation Safety Boeing
Company - testified before the House Aviation Subcommittee "Commercial
airplane structure is designed with sufficient strength, redundancy and
damage tolerance that single or even multiple handgun bullet holes would not
result in loss of the aircraft."  He further stated that a bullet hole would
almost certainly not cause a loss of cabin pressure. Even if it did, a loss
of cabin pressure is a problem that pilots are trained to deal with quite
easily.  The Federal Air Marshals have correctly judged that arming their
agents with firearms does not present an undue risk.  Moreover, recalling
that a FFDO would only use a firearm as a last resort, final line of
defense, any outcome that may occur is preferable to having the airplane
used as a guided bomb or shot down by a U.S. military fighter.


David Ross
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Greenwood" <mgreenwood@telus.net>
To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 18:42
Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] No guns for our airline pilots ......


> And I feel sorry for you Joe if your pilot mistakes something for a hijack
attempt, fires the gun causing explosive decompression and you plummet
39,000 ft to a very very hard landing.  The solution is to make sure that
box cutters never make it onto another aircraft, not turning pilots into
gunslingers.
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]