Re: DL's 757 Turn Time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A Southwest 'innovation', or so they choose to claim.

I can't imagine ATL ground control would be too happy with a bunch of
lethargic '757s pulling into their gates. ;-)

Matthew

On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 04:47 PM, Mike Gammon wrote:

> Unless part of their process includes taxiing in on one engine...
>
> Mike Gammon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Montano" <mmontano@direct.ca>
> To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU>
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:32 PM
> Subject: Re: DL's 757 Turn Time
>
>
>> 200 people out and in through a single door on United should take the
>> same amount of time that Southwest can turn the entire plane.
>>
>> 757s also require the port engine to be completely wound down before a
>> jet bridge can approach the L2 door. That's another few (crucial)
>> minutes.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 01:26 PM, RT Simpson wrote:
>>
>>> In a message dated 11/21/02 9:32:50 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
>>> mamula@oz.net writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I've always wondered about using the 757 in a low cost operation.
>>>
>>>
>>> This will be a first domestically.  One of the reasons the B737 has
>>> proven so
>>> crucial to Southwest's success is the aircraft can be turned around
>>> rather
>>> quickly.  I don't think Delta will find that the case with the B757.
>>>
>>> RT Simpson
>>> Phoenix
>>>
>>>>
>>>>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]