NYTimes.com Article: Vanguard Airlines Files for Bankruptcy and Suspends Service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by psa188@juno.com.



Vanguard Airlines Files for Bankruptcy and Suspends Service

July 31, 2002
By EDWARD WONG






Vanguard Airlines said yesterday that it was filing for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection because it had failed to
get financing and had been operating since Sept. 11 on a
diminishing pool of cash.

Vanguard, based in Kansas City, Mo., was operating 70
flights to and from 18 cities. It suspended service at 1
a.m. yesterday. It has been in business since 1994, but has
not been profitable in the six years it has been a public
company.

The airline's announcement came on the same day that
federal officials said they had turned down Vanguard for a
loan guarantee. Vanguard had applied for backing on nearly
all of an $8 million private loan. The government set up a
$10 billion loan guarantee program after Sept. 11 to help
airlines get private financing at a time when many
investors have shied away from the industry. The program is
administered by the Air Transportation Stabilization Board,
which in May rejected Vanguard's first application for a
loan guarantee.

"This is a disappointing day for everyone here at Vanguard
Airlines," Scott Dickson, the chief executive, said in a
written statement. "Much has been accomplished in the past
year, especially in light of the events of Sept. 11.
Unfortunately, our very public efforts to secure financing
through either the private markets or federal government
have come up short."

Mr. Dickson directly blamed the stabilization board for
Vanguard's seeking bankruptcy protection, saying the agency
"never seemed to grasp the intent of the enabling loan
guarantee legislation: restoring liquidity to all airlines
badly hurt by the events of Sept. 11 and ensuring that the
traveling public will continue to benefit from a
competitive airline industry."

Vanguard's shares, which traded as high as $287 in 1996,
closed yesterday at 25 cents, down $1.

In its rejection of the application, the agency said the
airline "did not provide a reasonable assurance that
Vanguard will be able to repay the loan."

Industry experts also said the three-member voting board
was right to reject Vanguard because the airline had a
flimsy business model and had not proved itself to be
creditworthy.

"The only reason these guys are in business this long is
that the investors have been too kind in giving them money
to cover their operating losses," said Darryl Jenkins,
director of the Aviation Institute at George Washington
University, based in Ashburn, Va. "If they went out of
business, nobody would miss them. This is ridiculous for
them to blame their problems on the stabilization board.
Their problems existed before 9/11."

Michael E. Levine, a former airline executive who teaches
government regulation at the Yale Law School, said that "if
they had a credible business plan, they would have gotten
financing." He said it was reasonable for banks or other
investment groups to look at the agency's rejections as
signs that Vanguard might not be creditworthy.

Vanguard reported a net loss of $28 million last year. It
had planned to report its second-quarter earnings this
week, but will not do so now.

Last December, the carrier applied for $55 million of
backing on a $60 million loan, then later changed it to
$13.5 million on a $15 million loan. That was rejected on
May 28, and Vanguard then asked for $35 million of backing
on a $40 million loan. It whittled that the $40 million
figure down over the last month to $8 million.

Vanguard operates a total of 14 planes, consisting of
Boeing 737's and MD-80's. It is keeping a core staff of 80
people in case it gets enough financing to start operations
again, said Elizabeth Cattell, vice president for
marketing. Three airlines - United, Frontier and National -
have said they will accept Vanguard advance-purchase
tickets on their flights or offering discount fares, Ms.
Cattell said.

Industry experts said that just because Vanguard was filing
for bankruptcy protection after the rejection did not mean
other airlines would need to follow the same path if they
were rejected.


http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/31/business/31AIR.html?ex=1029120294&ei=1&en=6673ca452a227e77



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
onlinesales@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]