SF Gate: Some American Airlines pilots want government to look at grounding Airbus planes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/news/archive/2002/03/27/n=
ational1751EST0771.DTL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 (AP)
Some American Airlines pilots want government to look at grounding Airbus p=
lanes
JONATHAN D. SALANT, Associated Press Writer


   (03-27) 15:39 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --
   American Airlines pilots have told the government it should consider
grounding the Airbus A300-600, one of which crashed in New York last year,
because of safety questions.
   American Airlines and Airbus Industrie say the plane is safe. The Federal
Aviation Administration has ordered new inspections of Airbus A300-600s
but has not ordered the aircraft not to fly.
   In a report submitted this week to the FAA and the National Transportati=
on
Safety Board, the American pilots concluded: "Serious consideration must
be given to grounding the entire A300-600 fleet until its airworthiness
can be assured."
   Eight pilots signed a letter accompanying the report, a copy of which was
obtained by The Associated Press. The pilots presented the report
Wednesday to their union, the Allied Pilots Association, which has not
endorsed the recommendations. Union representatives are helping the safety
board's investigation of the Nov. 12 crash, which killed 265 people.
   Some American pilots in January signed an e-mail petition asking the
company to ground the Airbus, but the effort failed. This is the first
time pilots have taken their request to the federal government. In their
letter, they attached the results of a two-month study analyzing safety
issues surrounding the plane.
   "The flying public must have assurances that every aircraft they board is
designed and maintained to the highest standards," the pilots said.
   Safety board spokesman Ted Lopatkiewicz said the agency had received the
report and would respond to it. FAA spokesman Les Dorr also said the
report would be reviewed.
   American Flight 587 experienced several sharp side-to-side movements
before its tail fell off and the plane crashed shortly after taking off
from Kennedy Airport. The FAA earlier this month ordered inspections of
A300-600 and A310 planes that experience similar movements. Both planes
have tails made of nonmetallic composite materials.
   In addition, tails of A300-600 planes that have hit turbulence in the pa=
st
or had sharp rudder movements underwent ultrasound inspections. American
checked two planes and found no damage.
   The inspections came after safety board investigators found previously
undetected damage to the tail of an American Airbus that swayed while
trying to land at West Palm Beach Airport in Florida, in May 1997. Two
people were injured.
   The Airbus that crashed in November had been severely shaken by air
turbulence in November 1994 while flying from Barbados to Puerto Rico,
injuring 47 people, federal investigators said.
   In addition, the plane's tail hit the runway while landing at Montego Ba=
y,
Jamaica, in December 1997, safety board records show. No one was injured.
   Dorr said future ultrasound inspections would depend on new evidence,
because taking off the tail could cause damage to the plane.
   In their report, the pilots called for reviewing the process for
certifying composite parts, and for redesigning the rudders. They said
there have been several instances when the Airbus rudders moved on their
own.
   In a statement, American Airlines noted that only eight of its 400 Airbus
pilots signed the latest letter, and said no one has refused to fly the
plane. "If they don't think the Airbus is airworthy, why are they still
flying it?" the airline statement asked.
   Airbus officials have said tests show that damage that can't be seen
cannot weaken the tail, and company spokeswoman Mary Anne Greczyn said the
safety board's investigation has not found any safety problems with the
plane. "The A300 was and remains a safe aircraft," she said.
   During the probe, board investigators discovered that moving a plane's
rudder in one direction, followed by a sharp movement in the other
direction, could break off the tail fin. The safety board issued such a
warning last month.

On the Net:
   National Transportation Safety Board: www.ntsb.gov
   Federal Aviation Administration: www.faa.gov
   Allied Pilots Association: www.alliedpilots.org
   American Airlines: www.amrcorp.com
   Airbus Industrie: www.airbus.com

=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2002 AP

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]