NYTimes.com Article: A Call for U.S. to Get Out of Terror Insurance for Airlines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by psa188@juno.com.



A Call for U.S. to Get Out of Terror Insurance for Airlines

February 26, 2002

By JOSEPH B. TREASTER




Maurice R. Greenberg, the chief executive of the American
International Group (news/quote) and a strong advocate of
government help in providing general terrorism coverage,
urged yesterday that Washington get out of the business of
providing terrorism coverage for United States airlines for
damage on the ground.

Mr. Greenberg said his company and other private insurers,
which refused to sell the coverage after the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks, were now willing to do so. For the
government to continue a subsidized insurance program for
the airlines, he said, would only stymie the full
development of the commercial insurance market.

"We, as taxpayers, don't want to compete with our own
government for business that the commercial sector can
underwrite," Mr. Greenberg said at a news conference at his
office in the Wall Street district.

Private insurers have continued to provide full coverage
for passengers and $50 million for ground damages, far
short of the $1 billion minimum required by lenders and
many national regulators.

Mr. Greenberg said his proposal was sent last Thursday to
Norman Y. Mineta, the transportation secretary, who
administers the government insurance program. Bill Mosely,
a spokesman for Mr. Mineta, declined to comment yesterday.

The Air Transport Association of America, the trade group
of the major airlines, said it was too soon to end the
government program because private coverage was not yet
being offered at prices that are "commercially reasonable."


Mr. Mineta must decide by March 20 whether to extend the
government program.

Congress created the special insurance program 11 days
after the September attacks. European governments followed
soon afterward with similar plans. But many countries
around the world did not provide insurance assistance to
their airlines. In early October, A.I.G. and 15 other
insurers began selling the coverage. The group, now up to
25 insurance companies, has signed up more than 200 foreign
carriers.

Now, Mr. Greenberg said, governments in Europe are ending
their programs and the airlines are turning to private
insurers.

Coverage from private insurers is several times as
expensive. Under the federal program, United States
airlines are required to buy the first $50 million from
private insurers for $1.25 for each passenger on every
flight. Then they pay a flat fee of $7.50 for each takeoff
for $3 billion to $4 billion in coverage, regardless of how
many passengers they carry. Jim Casey, deputy general
counsel for the Air Transport Association of America,
estimated that comes to about $850 million a year, mostly
to the private insurers.

>From private insurers alone, the coverage would cost at
least $2.25 a passenger on each flight. That would increase
costs to the United States airlines by $550 million, to
about $1.4 billion a year, Mr. Casey said. That would be on
top of $10 million to $80 million annually for each airline
for other coverages, up threefold to fourfold since the
September attacks.

The airlines are discussing forming their own cooperative
insurance company.

Mr. Greenberg brushed aside questions about potential
profits for his company. "Unless you can tell me there is
not going to be another terrorist attack," he said, "how
can you talk about profits?"

Mr. Greenberg said there was nothing inconsistent about
simultaneously appealing for government support for general
commercial insurance and calling for an end to it for the
airlines.

"They are two different things," Mr. Greenberg said.

In
airline coverage, he said, the costs for the insurer are
clearly defined, usually a maximum of $1 billion or $1.5
billion. But he said the potential for losses in general
coverage was far more variable. Many buildings and offices
could be damaged and thousands of people could be killed,
as they were at the World Trade Center. Each building and
each office carried separate coverage, and losses mounted
to an estimated $50 million, $3 million of which was for
the two aircraft that were flown into the twin towers.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/26/business/26INSU.html?ex=1015758591&ei=1&en=017d532ed3dff491



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
onlinesales@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]