Re: [Sky-1] Stricter Standards Spell Trouble For Soviet-Built jets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Come on Scotty, I know you're out there.



CICADAJET@aol.com wrote:

> Russia: Stricter Standards For World's Airliners Could Spell Trouble For
> Soviet-Built Jets
>
> By Jeremy Bransten
>
> Stricter noise pollution standards for commercial aircraft, established
> by the International Civil Aviation Organization, are due to come into
> effect worldwide on 1 April. Most industrialized countries, including
> all EU states, will enforce the new rules and the vast majority of
> airliners flying in those states already meet the more stringent
> requirements. But some Eastern European countries will face a problem,
> especially Russia. Eighty percent of its civilian aircraft fall short of
> the standards, meaning it will not be able to apply the new rules for
> domestic flights. Even more worrisome for Moscow is the fact that Russia
> could find many of its planes banned from foreign skies.
>
> Prague, 14 February 2002 (RFE/RL) -- Although stricter noise-level
> standards for civilian aircraft -- which are due to come into effect on
> 1 April -- are often believed to stem from EU legislation, the rules
> were in fact originated by the International Civil Aviation Organization
> (ICAO) and are meant to be applied globally. David Learmount, of "Flight
> International" magazine, tells RFE/RL this is an important distinction
> to make.
>
> "It's not EU-only, this is world. This is a ruling set by the
> International Civil Aviation Organization, which is a branch of the
> United Nations."
>
> The ICAO, established in 1944 by the Chicago Convention, is the
> acknowledged arbiter of standards for international civil aviation. Most
> of the world's countries with civil aviation fleets are members,
> including Russia and other Soviet successor states.
>
> The stricter noise pollution standards -- known in the industry as
> "stage 3 requirements" were discussed for many years before being agreed
> by ICAO members. Their intended implementation was announced almost a
> decade ago, meaning there is little sympathy -- especially in Western
> Europe -- for laggards who now find their commercial fleets unprepared.
>
> "This ruling has been coming for 8 years. It's been in the making since
> 1972. Russia has been fiercely lobbying to get an extension, but most
> Western European countries are not inclined to let them have it."
>
> Indeed, Russian Transport Minister Sergei Frank traveled to Brussels at
> the end of last month for talks with EU officials on obtaining such an
> extension. Frank said enforcement of the new rules could force Russia to
> cancel 11,000 flights in 2002, representing some 12 percent of the
> country's passenger traffic. But he was rebuffed.
>
> Moscow-based aviation analyst Vladimir Kornozov tells RFE/RL that amid
> all the political and economic upheaval of the past decade, Russia paid
> little attention to the impending change in rules, hoping to finagle an
> exemption at the last minute.
>
> "Quite simply, Russia has had many problems and the problems of new
> noise requirements has not been the biggest one, let's say. So the
> people in the corridors of power have spent their time solving other
> problems."

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]