Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED vs. AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED on MSVC
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>, bug-gnulib@xxxxxxx, autoconf@xxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED vs. AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED on MSVC
From
: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:21:21 -0700
In-reply-to
: <64681549.3F2A3RajZp@nimes>
Organization
: UCLA Computer Science Department
References
: <3217467.N7aMVyhfb1@nimes> <10256065.qUNvkh4Gvn@nimes> <
8d0e1a01-9438-802c-c23b-788a2124547e@cs.ucla.edu
> <64681549.3F2A3RajZp@nimes>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0
On 2023-04-16 08:18, Bruno Haible wrote:
Yes. Here are adjusted patches.
Thanks, I installed those.
References
:
AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED vs. AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED on MSVC
From:
Bruno Haible
Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED vs. AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED on MSVC
From:
Bruno Haible
Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED vs. AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED on MSVC
From:
Paul Eggert
Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED vs. AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED on MSVC
From:
Bruno Haible
Prev by Date:
Re: remaining tasks before Autoconf release
Next by Date:
Re: remaining tasks before Autoconf release
Previous by thread:
Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED vs. AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED on MSVC
Next by thread:
remaining tasks before Autoconf release
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[GCC Help]
[Kernel Discussion]
[RPM Discussion]
[Red Hat Development]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux USB]
[Samba]
