> On 16 Apr 2023, at 12:28, Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I presented the test results: >> - hello-3: no gnulib, just AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED >> - hello-4: no gnulib, just AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED >> - testdir3: a gnulib testdir for the modules largefile-required stat >> - testdir4: a gnulib testdir for the modules year2038-required stat >> >> mingw64 mingw32 msvc64 msvc32 >> >> hello-3 OK OK "support not detected" -> fail >> hello-4 OK OK "support not detected" -> fail >> testdir3 OK OK OK OK >> testdir4 OK OK OK OK > > Now, one could argue that in the above table the outcome should be: > > mingw64 mingw32 msvc64 msvc32 > > hello-3 OK OK "support not detected" -> fail > hello-4 OK OK OK OK > testdir3 OK OK OK OK > testdir4 OK OK OK OK > > since in hello-4 the maintainer has only asked for year 2038 > support, not for large files support. And the dependency from year 2038 > support to large files support exists only in glibc (since the glibc > developers found it pointless to add a 'struct stat' variant with > 32-bit off_t and 64-bit time_t). It is pointless indeed, it would require another 4 compat symbols with extra translation layer, further complexity for symbol redirection, and even more testing to check for any broken state (as we found while testing some some specific architectures).
