Re: On time64 and Large File Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Arsen Arsenović:

> Evening,
>
> Adam Sampson <ats@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> If the consensus on this does come down to the definition of new
>> architecture triplets, are there any other changes that should (or
>> could) be made at the same time, beyond time64 and LFS?
>
> Forwarding a suggestion from Arfrever:
>> Please consider making regoff_t 64-bit, on both 32-bit and 64-bit
>> architectures.
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5945
>> https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Regular-expressions
>
> If an ABI break is inevitable, or a new ABI for the multilib setups,
> this seems like a reasonable thing to include in it from my POV.

Uhm, this seems to be something affecting 64-bit targets, not 32-bit
targets, after the POSIX fix went in?  We have a few more such quirks.
(I understood the question to be about cleanup opportunities for 32-bit
architectures.)

Thanks,
Florian






[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux