Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Perry Hutchison: > > > Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I'm not convinced that this covers that particular corner case (build > >> at install time using a prefix setting that is different from configure > >> time). > > > > Can you describe a use case for this? It seems very odd. > > Use case for what? For "that particular corner case (build *at install time* using a prefix setting that is different from configure time)". > Building under "make install" (because it's the first > make invocation)? I don't see a use case for that. So we seem to agree that we don't intend to build under "make install". That being the case, what would be the use of capturing -- into a C header file, which is only used when building -- a variable setting passed to "make install"?
