Re: What's the right way to put `dnl' in the body of AT_CONFIGURE_AC text?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:11 PM Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to write a test case and autom4te doesn't like it ...
>
> AT_CONFIGURE_AC([[
> m4_define([fn_bar],[fn_quux])
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([fn_foo dnl
>                 fn_bar dnl Ordinary comment
>                 fn_blurf dnl Apos'trophed comment
> ])
> ]])

It turns out that writing `dn@&t@l` instead of `dnl` *does* work for
this.  I don't know why I thought it didn't.  Never mind.

zw




[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux