Re: STDCXX issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: autoconf@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: STDCXX issue
From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:23:33 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAMAf24LOg3SiWNGKfxK4N3t2zjLS7hW9KhHjysExRDdxYuVPuA@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: autoconf@xxxxxxx
References: <CAMAf24L=KtrYX+NCe6wFvtcPW9YTfNdehAPdpfJEz-Ct73i5yw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.2.20.2001200759390.19783@freddy.simplesystems.org> <CAMAf24LOg3SiWNGKfxK4N3t2zjLS7hW9KhHjysExRDdxYuVPuA@mail.gmail.com>

Vincent Blondel (2020/01/20 15:10 +0100):
> both ..._stdcxxx.m4 files are in the m4 subfolder ... is that not
> enough ?

As far as I know each .m4 file needs to be included explicitly.

Sébastien.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: STDCXX issue
  - From: Bob Friesenhahn

References:
- STDCXX issue
  - From: Vincent Blondel
- Re: STDCXX issue
  - From: Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: STDCXX issue
  - From: Vincent Blondel

Prev by Date: Re: STDCXX issue
Next by Date: Re: STDCXX issue
Previous by thread: Re: STDCXX issue
Next by thread: Re: STDCXX issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [GCC Help] [Kernel Discussion] [RPM Discussion] [Red Hat Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux USB] [Samba]

Powered by Linux