Re: Autoconf protype breaks GCC builtin inlining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $LDNAME supports $LDFLAGS])
>   AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([])],
>     [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]); AC_SUBST([tr_RESULT], [1])],
>     [AC_MSG_RESULT([no]); AC_SUBST([tr_RESULT], [0])]
> )

Thanks for the example!  Why is AC_COMPILE_IFELSE enough?  Don't you
have to invoke the linker itself to see if it accepts the option passed
through?  And is the "-Wl," part applicable to most/all compilers?

BTW my other generic linker option is --enable-new-dtags.  I'd be
interested to hear opinions about its usage as well.  I found no other
way to run build-time test for a shared library dlopening modules.
(I know libtool can provide better portability than dlopen.)
-- 
Thanks,
Feri

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf



[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux