On 03/01/2017 02:35 PM, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
My query is this: Would libexecdir be the best place to put a file that
is architecture dependent, but *not* meant to be executed separatedly
(it's a library). Or should it actually be stored under libdir
$libexecdir is meant to take a suite's/package's
"internal/sub-programs/executables/scripts" (typically with executable
permissions). Think of it as a auxiliary $bindir, which is supposed not
to be in $PATH.
$libdir/<subdir>/ (e.g. %libdir/<package>) is the playground a package
can install more or less whatever it wants, comprising executables.
As your "scripts" don't seem to be "programs", $libdir/<subdir> probably
is what you are looking for.
> (which
> I've never seen done with a shell library of functions)?
Storing script fragments or scripts in $libdir would be unusual and
discussworthy, but installing these to $libdir/<packages>/ is quite common.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
