Dixi quod… > On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Eric Blake wrote: > > > I also think we can try harder to point out the need for config.h to > > appear first. How about the following counter-proposal: […] > Nice, but I think I can improve on that a bit (later, I’m almost > dropping down due to tiredness), it still confuses me a bit ;) What do you think about this? I tried several variants and ended up making it a bullet point list, and I think the result is quite less ambiguous (especially if one is not a native English speaker) than the original text. I’ve also changed “be sure” to an imperative “ensure” in the usage notes. bye, //mirabilos -- >> Why don't you use JavaScript? I also don't like enabling JavaScript in > Because I use lynx as browser. +1 -- Octavio Alvarez, me and ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ (Mario Lang) on debian-devel _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
