On 13/10/16 15:24, Russell Shaw wrote: > On 13/10/16 13:11, Luca Saiu wrote: > > ... > > So, what I'm asking you is: does a clean solution exist, or compiling > > without a runtime library is just not supported by the Autotools? It > > sounds weird to say that for configuring you need a cross-compiler with > > support for a runtime that will never even be linked when building. > > Shouldn't there be, at least, one variant of AC_PROG_CC which doesn't > > fail in a fatal way? > > > > I'm not yet linking the code in a public forum just because it still > > lacks copyright and license headers; but in case it were useful to you, > > even if I doubt it, I can clean it up and publish it. > > It can be messy and take quite some time to figure out what to do, but this kind > of stuff is handled in the autoconf/automake/autogen build system of binutils > and gcc. Not a quick and easy path for the uninitiated though. Or maybe, you could consider something along the lines of MINGW_AC_PROG_CC_COMPILE_ONLY, (and associated support macros), as included within this aclocal.m4: https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/mingw-org-wsl/ci/5.0-active/tree/aclocal.m4 -- Regards, Keith. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
