> > The division "open source" vs "commercial" is wrong. you certainly know that > open source is a development model, it can be and it is used both in > commercial and non-commercial projects. I'm sorry - you're absolutely right Ineiev - please forgive my oversight. I made a fatal mistake using "open source" vs "commercial". Of course, I meant "free software" vs "commercial". I tend toward that mistake and it's silly that I do because I've worked for companies like Novell that capitalize on open source all the time. > date, but it's about 85% of the same content as the published book and > > formatted in a similar manner. I could have requested that the site owner, > > Tony Mobily, remove it from the site and he would have complied (because > > he's a nice guy), but I felt it was important to contribute back to the > > community in some way for the help they gave me in writing the book in the > > first place.) > > I hope you didn't intend to say that people have to restrict their readers in > order to get money for writing manuals. that wouldn't be true. No - not at all - the only reasons I haven't gotten the online version up to date are laziness and/or lack of time. I'll get around to it sometime soon. John _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
