Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014-09-04 13:47 -0400, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> I have just added an article to my blog on my programming language
> about the GNU AutoTools. Please feel free to comment.
> 
> http://kori-programming-language.blogspot.ca/2014/09/a-closer-look-at-gnu-autotools.html

Quoted from the linked page:
> After some investigation, I discovered that the documentation for GNU
> AutoTools was crappy. This is surprising considering how long it has
> been in use. ☹

Can you be more constructive?  I think Autoconf and Automake have rather
good manuals[1][2].  Why are they crappy?  How can we make them better?

[1] https://gnu.org/s/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html
[2] https://gnu.org/s/automake/manual/automake.html

Thanks,
-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf





[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux