On 2014-09-04 20:02 -0400, Shawn H Corey wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:40:40 -0600 > "John Calcote" <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: autoconf-bounces+john.calcote=gmail.com@xxxxxxx > > > [mailto:autoconf-bounces+john.calcote=gmail.com@xxxxxxx] On Behalf > > > Of Shawn H Corey > > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:05 PM > > > > > > You mean those ASCII diagrams that should be inside <pre></pre> > > > tags? And you don't think that's crappy? > > > > Are they in some way unreadable? The point is to convey information. > > If they accomplish that task, how could they be better? If the > > definition of crappy is "they're not polished eye candy", well then I > > guess they're crappy, but for my own uses they suffice. > > They're unreadable in proportionally=space fonts. The web isn't stuck > with just monospaced ones. My browser uses a monospace font for the diagrams, and they look OK to me. Is there a problem with the HTML code? You may have discovered a bug in Texinfo. The font is correct in the PDF version of the manual. Thanks, -- Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/) _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
