Re: AC_INIT bug-address question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:02:18PM CEST:
> This bit of NEWS from 2.68 is probably relevant then:
> 
> ** AC_INIT again allows URLs with '?' for its BUG-REPORT argument.
>    Regression introduced in 2.66.
> 
> It doesn't mention '<' or '>', but those are also characters that
> fail AS_LITERAL_IF but should pass the new AS_LITERAL_HEREDOC_IF
> macro that is used in 2.68 (but not 2.67) for the BUG-REPORT
> argument.

Does it matter that autoconf/general.m4, autoconf/status.m4, and
autotest/general.m4 wrap PACKAGE_BUGREPORT in < ... > in their messages?
Would look a bit ugly as <A U Thor <address@xxxxxxxxxxx>>.

Cheers,
Ralf

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux