Re: AC_INIT bug-address question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/13/2010 08:50 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Eric Blake<eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
What does this warning mean?  What's wrong with my bug-reporting
address... is this a bug?

Which version of autoconf?  Does it still happen with 2.68?

2.67   (it's been happening for a while, not sure what version it started with)

I'll try it with 2.68 when I get a chance.

This bit of NEWS from 2.68 is probably relevant then:

** AC_INIT again allows URLs with '?' for its BUG-REPORT argument.
   Regression introduced in 2.66.

It doesn't mention '<' or '>', but those are also characters that fail AS_LITERAL_IF but should pass the new AS_LITERAL_HEREDOC_IF macro that is used in 2.68 (but not 2.67) for the BUG-REPORT argument.

--
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux