* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:12:56AM CET: > The conditional inclusion of content is only an optimization. True. > The > content of the typical config.h is quite easy to parse. Opening the > file to inspect it is surely much more overhead than whatever > parsing overhead is saved by the extra conditional. Modern compilers like GCC won't ever open a header twice if that is safe to do so; that is, it has an inclusion guard around all of its non-comment contents, and no related defines changed since the last inclusion. Of course parsing of config.h is probably still negligible compared to most optimization passes, or even just parsing any nontrivial C++ program. One much better reason not to guard config.h is that, by documentation, multiple inclusion of it is erroneous, and inclusion of several config.h files, possibly from different locations, is dangerous practice, and I want the preprocessor to help me and complain about this if it can. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
