On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:12:13PM +0000, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > > > > Josef noted that he did not want this to change. I'm inclined to agree > > > with him, people who are cross-compiling may not have all of the `tools' > > > available as triplet-prefixed-name, but are likely to have their PATH > > > set correctly to point at the cross-tools. > > I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the > first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning. > But I do believe that proper naming is the way to go. > > Then I created the proper names using symlinks and the problem went > away. I don't know anything about what you guys are talking about, but, i know that symlinks don't work well on windows. Do you have a workaround for msys/windows, or systems that don't handle symlinks well? Bob Rossi _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf