Re: Noooooooooo!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:12:13PM +0000, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > 
> > > Josef noted that he did not want this to change. I'm inclined to agree
> > > with him, people who are cross-compiling may not have all of the `tools'
> > > available as triplet-prefixed-name, but are likely to have their PATH
> > > set correctly to point at the cross-tools.
> 
> I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the
> first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning.
> But I do believe that proper naming is the way to go.
> 
> Then I created the proper names using symlinks and the problem went
> away.

I don't know anything about what you guys are talking about, but, i know
that symlinks don't work well on windows. Do you have a workaround for
msys/windows, or systems that don't handle symlinks well?

Bob Rossi


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux