> Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > > Josef noted that he did not want this to change. I'm inclined to agree > > with him, people who are cross-compiling may not have all of the `tools' > > available as triplet-prefixed-name, but are likely to have their PATH > > set correctly to point at the cross-tools. I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning. But I do believe that proper naming is the way to go. Then I created the proper names using symlinks and the problem went away. I've yet to see a case where fixing this in the way autoconf "wants" is even mildly difficult. If one doesn't have root, just make a subdir that contains the symlinks and add that subdir to the PATH. If it's time to "go one way or the other", let's DTRT and lose this old hackaround. H _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
