Re: aclocal-1.9 and aclocal-1.10 are failing while aclocal-1.7 is not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the quick reply! It works nicely now...

Christian

2008/7/25 Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxx>:

"Christian Pagé" <page.christian@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > 3- Run aclocal-1.10 (or aclocal-1.9). The result is:
> > configure.ac:19: error: AC_SUBST: `DX_FLAG_[]DX_CURRENT_FEATURE' is not
> a
>
> That looks very much like too much quoting.  In fact, this:
>
>    AC_SUBST([DX_FLAG_[]DX_CURRENT_FEATURE], 0)
>
> should be written like this:
>
>    AC_SUBST([DX_FLAG_]DX_CURRENT_FEATURE, 0)
>
> Versions of aclocal before 1.8 didn't use the m4 tracing facility, so
> the error does not show during its run, but autoconf still complains.
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
> SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux