Re: aclocal-1.9 and aclocal-1.10 are failing while aclocal-1.7 is not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Christian Pagé" <page.christian@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> 3- Run aclocal-1.10 (or aclocal-1.9). The result is:
> configure.ac:19: error: AC_SUBST: `DX_FLAG_[]DX_CURRENT_FEATURE' is not a

That looks very much like too much quoting.  In fact, this:

    AC_SUBST([DX_FLAG_[]DX_CURRENT_FEATURE], 0)

should be written like this:

    AC_SUBST([DX_FLAG_]DX_CURRENT_FEATURE, 0)

Versions of aclocal before 1.8 didn't use the m4 tracing facility, so
the error does not show during its run, but autoconf still complains.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux