Re: just one of a million reasons why autoconf is a worthless piece of shit (2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 17:12 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Second, if you think you can write your own "config script" that will be
> > portable to even a small fraction of the systems that an autoconfiscated
> 
> LOL!  I think you wanted to say autoconfed/autoconfied here.
> Autoconfiscated makes it sound like you agree with the troll :)

Nope.  I meant what I said.  That's a common term 'round these parts.
Heck, it's even in Wikipedia
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoconfiscation ) so you KNOW it's
real! :-p


Cheers!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Paul D. Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>          Find some GNU make tips at:
 http://www.gnu.org                      http://make.mad-scientist.us
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux