On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Paul Smith wrote: > Second, if you think you can write your own "config script" that will be > portable to even a small fraction of the systems that an autoconfiscated LOL! I think you wanted to say autoconfed/autoconfied here. Autoconfiscated makes it sound like you agree with the troll :) > actually _produced_ anything better. Odd. There ARE alternatives. I think they're just as bad (not worse, not better) than autoconf, though. > And, if you don't care about your project being portable, then indeed: > why are you even bothering with autoconf? Why, it is trendy! -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
