On Jan 29, 2008 5:25 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It is true that if the text of this macro is included in your package > that it then includes source components which are GPL even if the > built package is not GPL. You might be required to provide notice of > that. Is this "mere aggregation", though? My reasoning is that as soon as autoconf sucks in the macro definitions, it does TWO things simultaneously: * Invokes the macro's licence exception * Creates a derived work. Now if you were to modify the macro (to fix a bug, to add a feature, whatever), maybe then things change. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
